Barelds, D. P. H., & Barelds-Dijkstra, P. (2007). Links one of companion identity characteristic similarity, relationships onset, relationship top quality, and you will love. [ Hyperlinks ]

Baxter, L. A beneficial., & West, L. (2003). Couples attitudes of their parallels and you may variations: Good dialectical position. Log off Individual and you may Social Matchmaking, 20, 491-514. [ Backlinks ]

Berscheid, Age. (1985)patibility, interdependence, and you can emotion. Within the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you can incompatible relationship (pp. 143-161). Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]

Berscheid, Age., Dion, K., Walster, Age., & Walster, G. W. (1971). Real elegance and you can relationships choice: An examination of one’s complimentary hypothesis. Diary away from Experimental Social Therapy, eight, 173-189. [ Hyperlinks ]

Diary out-of Public and personal Relationships, 24, 479-496

Berscheid, E., & Regan, P. (2005). The newest therapy away from interpersonal matchmaking. Upper Seat River, NJ: Pearson Training (Prentice Hall). [ Website links ]

Berger, C. R. (1975). Activity abilities and you will attributional telecommunications once the determinants away from social destination. Message Monographs, forty, 280-286. [ Website links ]

Berscheid, Age., & Reis, H. T. (1998). Appeal and you will intimate matchmaking. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The brand new handbook regarding personal therapy (Vol. dos, 4th ed. Pp. 193-281). Ny: McGraw-Mountain. [ Links ]

Buckwalter, J. G., Carter, S. Roentgen., Forgatch, G. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, N. C. (2004, Could possibly get 11). U.S. Patent 6,735,568. Washington, DC. [ Hyperlinks ]

Buckwalter, J. Grams., Carter, S. R., Forgatch, G. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, Letter. C. (2008, The fall of. 18). You.S. Patent eight,454,357B2. Washington, DC. [ Links ]

Buss, D. M. (1984). Relationship assortment getting character dispositions: Investigations that have around three various other data supply. Conclusion Genetics, 14, 111-123. [ Hyperlinks ]

Byrne, D., & Rhamey, Roentgen. (1965). Magnitude from negative and positive reinforcements because a determinant of attraction. Record regarding Identification and you may Personal Psychology, 2, 884-889. [ Backlinks ]

Carter, S. R. (2005, Feb.), To possess progressive-day Cupids, study replaces dating: Mental science are trailing the newest effective matches made on eHarmony. Organization getting Mental Research Observer, 18. Downloaded regarding [ Backlinks ]

Carter, S. Roentgen., & Buckwalter, J. G. (2009). Boosting partner choices over the internet: An evaluation out-of dating high quality anywhere between marriages due to an internet relationship program and you can marriages as a result of unfettered alternatives. Interpersona: A worldwide Journal to your Individual Matchmaking, 3, 105-125. [ Hyperlinks ]

Carter, S., & Snow, C. (2004, May). Helping singles get into finest marriage ceremonies using predictive types of relationship achievements. Paper showed at the 16th Yearly Summit of one’s American Psychological Area. [ Hyperlinks ]

Method and you can system having distinguishing individuals who are attending has actually a successful relationship

C). Why does personality number during the ination from attribute stress, negativity, and relationship satisfaction. Diary regarding Identification and you will Public Therapy, 78, 326-336. [ Backlinks ]

Clark, M. S. (1985). Effects regarding matchmaking variety of to have understanding compatibility. When you look at the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and in conflict relationships (pp. 119-140) bästa Dominicans datingwebbplats. Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]

Coombs, Roentgen. H., & Kenkel, W. F. (1966). Sex variations in relationships aspiration and satisfaction having computer system-arranged partners. Record regarding ily, twenty eight, 62-66. [ Backlinks ]

Cooper, A great., & Sportolari, L. (1997). Love on the internet: Facts on the internet attraction. Log out of Sex Degree and you will Medication, 22, 7-14. [ Links ]

Dijkstra, P., & Barelds, D. P. H. (2008). Do somebody understand what they want: A comparable or subservient mate? Evolutionary Therapy, six, 595-602. [ Website links ]

Feingold, A good. (1988). Coordinating for elegance in romantic partners and you can exact same-sex nearest and dearest: A meta-study and you will theoretic complaints. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 226-235. [ Website links ]

Felmlee, D. H. (2001). Out-of attractive to appalling: Disenchantment that have an intimate mate. Sociological Viewpoints, 44, 263-280. [ Website links ]